|
DavyJones, if I might be so bold I'd like to define what a hypoctite is. I'll give you a real life example of a hypoctite I met recently:
Someone recently called me an idiot for not knowing what I was talking about. The irony is that the idiot that called me such, has no idea what he's talking about. He presumed to know me, my experience and knowledge based on the fact that at this moment in time, I was a goomba in a game.
Now that I have lowered myself to your level of name calling, pointless aggresion and destructive rather than constructive critism, I'll address some of the points you attempted to make.
I highly doubt that.
Las Vegas was essentially leveled in a minute of shooting. I appreciate that the prep was longer but the attack was not. I have been involved in the planning of wars, I have planned my own and I know that so long as you have the guns, you don't need the intelligence.
Well I think its always been established that the person(s) that put in the most amount of work usually have better accounts.
That's not in question, I know that to be the case. I've had accounts where I have "One Shot" Don leaders. I put in alot of time on those accounts but what I am questioning is that tactically, I could have achieved that doing nothing but training my gun, something which in my opinion should not be the case.
OR do you still think that people that put in the work should be penalized cause the other lazy asses can't keep up?
Missing the point yet again. I want good guns, I just don't want guns that can level a city in a minute.
I just leave that to the donkeys that aim and point aimlessly, and my feast is served.
I'm not aiming and pointing aimlessly, I'm suggesting something I believe would better the game. What I would ask is anyone that decides to comment, please do so productively, I'm not a fan of arguing with school children. |