Slash - I have respect for your position in this society of ours, and the rank that you hold.  But the flippant and glib response to my careful and considered, not to mention respectful, rebuttal of your accusations is beneath your dignity.

Slash and KuKu make a great team. I call it the underlay for the overlay. 

You asked Slash why you weren't trusted and your retort is generally, no net loss...no net loss?

We all know that generally money goes out as fast as it comes in.  While your father was removed etc, to those ultimately tarnished by association to your family's ill gotten gains it's not you that needed the money back.  Whether the payments were an actual net loss or a perceived net loss is moot.

Imagine if you will, your CL "gifts" you $50 million, saying nothing about it needing repaid.  You spend it on bgs and many other things so that soon you have nothing left.  How do you feel when a month later he/she suddenly demands the $50 million back?  Do you rationally think..."Oh well, no net loss..."?  I'm betting you wouldn't.  Would you then trust the next offer of a gift or would you warily leave it in a bank account expecting the same outcome next time?

That's why your name, and the concept of your name being associated to any money related venture, isn't trusted by a proportion of people.  I look at your ideas and self-aggrandisement and generally ignore what you say but when you bleat about how you are the innocent family member trying to right the wrongs of a very recent bad apple then it sticks in the craw a little.  Rather than be all "you should trust me...honest" why not just sit in the background and show you can be trusted?