Just so that we are absolutely clear, Right, you refuse to condemn those that are hit-listing a made member of Chicago? 

I will counter that with another question, all Right?

Am I obliged to condemn someone anonymous because the leader of the 25th largest crew, and joined smallest crew, in the whole nation, who bought his leadership instead of working his way up, feels I should?

I will do something my boss tells me to do, not what a self-proclaimed leader of the str...

Sorry, I really can't say that without chuckling..

I will always do what my boss tells me to do, but I have no intention to let someone pretentious tell me what to say or not say. Maybe you should try to use your degree in psychology to get a free course on human interaction somewhere?

You are obliged to condemn the hit-listing of the leaders of another city because you are representing your own boss, Charles_Barkley, despite your attempts to censor his mail 

You say I am obliged to answer you because I am a Right Hand, yet cannot answer mails because I am a Right Hand? Right..
I am not censoring any mail. I told you that I am not sharing my personal views with you.
It says quite a bit about you that you are addressing crew leaders if you encounter someone on the streets that does not agree with you.
The supposed leader of the streets... Renting his true leadership. Bossing people around that have nothing to do with him.. her..

Also, It's none of your damn business how I handly my mail or how we handle ours.
 

So, again, to clarify, and what you said elsewhere on the Streets, you refuse to condemn the hit-listers, and you believe that I should be killed?

I am not giving you my opinion.
Therefore you don't know how I feel, what I think. With that, I advice you to not analyse it into something I did not say.

Elsewhere on the Streets, I advised Grin-07 to not shoot you for being hitlisted.
Where did I say I think you should be killed?

I have my opinions and ideas, but I will not share them with you. Even though you feel you are the leader of the Streets..
Well, actually maybe it's because of the bloody taradiddle.

Funny how many other people know exactly what I think and you don't, Right?

Right and Kirsty.  This was the last thing I wanted to get involved in today, my to-do-list is quite long...I have a basketball contest to arrange - side promo, check out the streets in the coming days!  That I am spending any time here is a colossal waste of my time.

Anyway, I think we can safely agree that hitlisting leaders either anonymously or otherwise isn't a good thing although it can and has been used to stir things up but trying to ascribe a motive or some psychological condition based on any hits being anonymous doesn't really work as the presumption that it is a he is just that - presumptive.  Using war crimes as an example is slightly fatuous is it not?  The only people that take part in wars these days are probably 99.99% male, it's like saying if a basket is scored in basketball they must have a fantastic male physique because no woman has played pro basketball...yet a woman can hold a ball and through it through a hoop in the exact same way I can. 

And what is a war crime anyway?  Has it been properly codified yet?

I mean; whether it's pee-pantery, excess cash burning a hole, excess burning pee causing aggravation or a genuine beef with the way Grin-07 runs his city.  Personally, I think he is running Chicago as well and as effectively as Grinble Beach, I'm sure it can only be a great thing yet obviously not to everyone's taste.  Even if these sort of things are carried out by people that kiss sisters, cousins or spades is neither here nor there.  I understand it is frustrating for Grin-07, Zapata etc to raise money to pay these off and maybe that, and I genuinely mean this with all the respect in the world, is where the true focus on impotence should be.  We (the royal we) can only look so far and do so much to find who is doing this yet with wealth passing from generation to generation, if you find/suspect one person then their daughter (or son) can continue their "work".

I see you mentioned my associate Left.  I don't see his input in this discussion.  You have already complained of his comments to you and yet you look to goad him into coming in here.  I understand your frustration, but I sympathise with Grin even more on this.

Do you want to have a dip in the psychological paddling pool?

Make of that what you will, and don't forget who you are speaking to: Kirsty, commander of the join third largest crew in The Loop, Chicago, and de fact leader of the Streets. 

I mean...referring to yourself in the third person? Swinging a metaphorical dick in the face of people?  De facto leader of the streets? If there is one person standing in a city square shouting and screaming to all and sundry does that make them the de facto town crier?  I'm sure someone with a psychology degree would have a field day with that.

Kirsty, you are reverting to type when people are not agreeing with you.  I don't see Right defending the hitlisters I see him starting off by saying you can't presume it's a male and I agree.  There are many "womanly" ways to deal with someone...poison apparently is quite common among housewives however it's not an option in this life so yes...a woman would absolutely use this mechanism.  If 90% of mobsters are male, the statistics are weighed hugely in the odds of it being a man but let's use the theory that if women are more frequent users of poison and the rationale being a distance element...then the hitlist is the perfect tool for that is it not?

So, either male or female.  Either impotent, enraged or looking for distance?  It's like a game of Who's Who.

Thank you, Charles_Barkley - I agree with the majority of the things that you said and I hope that you have a very pleasant day.

Men whipping their dicks around to see who has the biggest and then calling each other gay for looking just a little too long. 

On these streets?

Delicate gasps

Shocking. 

Clearly, it was too long for you to follow, Delicate, as you apparently missed the part where that was discussed..