| Oct 17 - 22:50:04 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1  |
| Stealth influence: People | Started by: Aldo on Jun 06, '11 04:46 |
|
I saw other posts relating to stealth in this forum, and I thought of this one.
I was thinking, if you were firing on a lone street at someone near you (i.e. noone online in your city but you, the person you're shooting, and possibly a few others), or shooting from a crowd of people at someone (i.e. a holiday where a lot of people in your city are online at the moment)
And that those would also have an effecto on the victim would see you or not.
I don't think this has been suggested recently, not sure though. |
|
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Well it certainly would make sense, that's for sure. I see no problem with this. |
|
| Reply by: Alesia at Jun 06, '11 10:41 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I like this idea, it definitely makes sense. |
|
| Reply by: Jonny at Jul 28, '11 17:16 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
i like this aswell does make alot fo sense :) |
|
| Reply by: Activy at Jul 29, '11 19:42 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The cities that we are in are huge. Massive. Both in size and number of people.To base ones stealth off of number of active users doesn't make sense in this context, to me anyway. What would make more sense in my mind is the number of WS's that go out could easily be affected by the number of people currently active during the attempted shot.
Example: Having 100 people watch you walk through a crowd. They obviously can identify you if you act out of line. It doesn't mean the person you are walking behind about to shank will be any more aware that you are there.
Though, I do understand the concept of potential less stealth in more public areas I just think more WS's sent out makes a bit more sense.
All in all, not a bad suggestion. Deffinatly something the commity should look over and potentially mold a bit. |
|
| Reply by: TheBigEasy at Aug 04, '11 12:04 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1  |
Minimum $20,000