I think some animosity stems from that previously-linked thread, where it seemed like you announced the conclusion of your research but did not release said results to people who had participated (admittedly, in a generally non-consensual way) in your research process. 

I feel like, moving forward, it's important to consult your school's institutional review board to formulate a research plan and consequently carry out research that not only can help answer your questions and improve results, but also respect the boundaries of people included in your evaluations. I'm not sure about the legality of things, and maybe you did clear it with your IRB, but the research will be much more robust and useful to you should you follow those guidelines. 

Obviously it's quite possible you did not have access to those resources considering you had not yet started your BA process, so hopefully you can merely take this as advice; not judgement or hate. At the end of the day, please remember that the people you benefit through your research are not only those who it is originally created for (ie, your professor as you had suggested, fellow students, your academics), it can also help all of us on MR learn, all of the people who read your work in the future or who can quote it in a scholarly article. The benefits of your study are not only for those behind the glass observational windows. When you indicate you wish to improve systems in the U.S., please remember that people here (to some degree), are indeed living people who exist in said country!

*insert British person saying they aren't*, you get the idea. 

You did not respond to me you presented another question . I responded to you. 

 I never berated you,

so telling you I have not  decided on my dissertation topic yet and stating that I have answered the question you presented time and time gain is berating? 

Saying let's air out your grievances against me here and now is berating? 

I explained what it is was it was observation of the Hawthorne effect in practice. I also said it had nothing to do with a dissertation. That was assumed by the readers. It was no conclusion of research it was not research it was observation of sociological theory. To show us that that no matter who observes  the Hawthorne effect and no matter the environment ,  observes the same thing  which makes the Hawthorn effect a valid theory.    I explained this several times actually under several different character names. 

I get people are upset at being observed  for it , that is why there was an invitation extended to discuss it as was suggested the proper way to do it by the professor .

and no one took up the invitation instead people act out how they feel.   they do not communicate they react. 

How am I supposed to know what it is the issue if  I am not told? 

 You all are under some impression I research notes on some dissertation there is no research on any dissertation. It does not exist it has only existed in your ideas. Because you do not read what I actually say you skim it or only read it till you feel you have something to respond on. 

So I understand your side, but I don't see anyone even trying to understand my side.  Or comprehend what I am saying or seeing there is some communication error and trying to help the communication flow better. 

It has been implied to me a couple times I should feel regret. 

. I don't regret anything. Maybe that is what people want, but I don't.

  I do apologize that obviously I made some people feel threatened or violated  some how over that , that is why I offered  to discuss it in the original thread.    But I don't regret anything I do . 

Again - I am not upset. I was interested in your study in the beginning, but your personality destroyed my interest.

All's I know is i have been stuck with the label 'Troll' personally quite often in my younger days simply for disagreeing or putting forwards an alternative viewpoint to the one commonly agreed upon in any particular area, and i am not in the least sadistic, I have been to enough shrinks in my life and i assure you it would be there in my notes if i was in any way sadisticly inclined, i am inclined to debate and that is not sadistic, it would be perhaps fair to call it 'oppositional' but that is different. Sadism denotes getting some pleasure from the pain of others, that's just not me, it is my understanding, and correct me if i am wrong here, but sadism is not so common as to account for posts on almost every single video on youtube in the history of the platform. 

If for example i go to a flat earth channel and i say in the livestream chat or in the comment section, hey folks .. i don't think the world is flat .. BAM !! Trolll Trolll !!!

that's the label and thats the only reason for it, i did not just agree with most the others there about some topic they were supposedly discussing with 'open minds'

Sadists actually hurt people, and it is very debatable if to offend someone online is the same thing. I Would suggest that it is not, I'd Guess that a true sadist would want to have a real life person to hurt.

Those are the ones who get arrested for torturing multiple victims after years of evading authority's and i myself really just find it unlikely they would be running around online just being a pest and shit posting in their spare time.

However I could always be wrong, just that's my admittedly limited understanding of it. 

I think you are confusing attitude and personality which are different.

Personality is who I am ,

you don't know me, never took the chance to know me. Neither did the LV/La family I was with for several months.  

because you let yourself be offended my my post of my Hawthorne effect observation of a theory. and let it fester and never spoke to me about it like an adult.   

Attitude is my reaction to you. my attitude changes with the interaction I receive from people.

 You see some people will  tell I am the sweetest person they ever met and some will tell you I am the most horrible person ever. Believe them both I act accordingly.

 If you don't like me quit wasting your energy on me. 

So we are done now, because I am not going to sit here and repeat myself to people dedicated to misunderstanding me.