A substantial man leaves a meeting with his disappointing nephew and strides over to the waiting crowd.  He begins to speak...

"A man offered me $25m to give this speech.  It was a good proposition, and who am I to turn it down?  I am after all, @Proposition_Joe.

So, here is the speech.  The man who compiled these statistics and wrote the speech identified himself as "Neil" - I don't know anything else about him.

"@Constipated (Con) shocked the world of organised crime when he offered the hand of friendship to John_Fareham.  John shook that hand, and was then surprised when Con gave him, John, the honour of acting as his right-hand.

Well, John was honoured.  Numerous representatives from various underground factions approached John asking him to betray Con.  John rejected them all, and was keen to make his name, his mark, and a legacy with Con.

John worked as many hours as he could for Con.  He dealt with his mail, a lot of which was of a confidential nature.  He donated to his crew, he talked to his members.  He was, basically, the opposite of what many expected him to be.

And then, during a clearly humorous exchange with a colleague, Con shot him dead.

Clearly, there is a public interest in finding out what people thought.  So we asked people to give us their thoughts.  I will give YOU their responses.

We asked:

Did Con’s reasons for killing John_Fareham make any sense?

Of the 11 people that answered, 23% said NO it made no sense, whilst 77% said YES it made sense.

3/11 people saw no sense, whilst 8/11 saw sense.

We asked:

Should Con have given John_Fareham the RHM position to begin with?

64% (7 people) said NO, 36% (4 people) said YES

We asked:

Should revenge attacks be launched against Con in reprisal for killing John_Fareham?

23% said Yes avenge John, whilst 77% said NO.

3/11 people wanted revenge for John, whilst 8/11 didn't.

We asked:

Is Con a good leader?

64% (7 people) said Yes, 36% (4 people) said No

We asked:

Was John_Fareham a good RHM?

64% (7 people) said No, 36% (4 people) said Yes

We asked (having presumed that John descenged from the Kuku lineage) people to comment on whether the Kuku lineage was a net benefit to our society, or a net loss.

You said:

Net benefit - 46% (5 people)

Net loss - 54% (6 people)

An interesting result - almost half of the sample believe the Kuku lineage is a net benefit, despite some of them being content with his murder.

We then asked if anyone had anything to add.  They did.  This is what was said:

 Should fuck off

 Who the fucku is kuku

 going rouge is anoying no need to kill people new name new life let the past die

 I dont know what this is about. I never heard of kuku. I never have met john farewell and constipation sounds like an illness. I randomly gave   answers

 Would be nice to see more CH targets getting the focus, but overall seems like it was merited and really all Con's fault. Bit sad he can't   tell the difference between jokes and criticism innit?

 All hail Kuku

So, there we have it.  Most people seem to support Con, but John was not without support, either.

@LameLordLouis shot and killed numerous people of rank, power, and prestige, and it has been claimed that this was in reprisal for John's murder.

It remains to be seen whether, or not, John's descendants feel he had been adequately avenged.  

Con has been quiet, but he was seen shouting at a self-proclaimed satirist -  we are entitled to ask:

Is Constipated a psychotic, humourless loose cannon, liable to kill anyone who jokes?"