| Sep 21 - 18:21:02 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1  |
| This is how to Time Travel. | Started by: -Camzilla on Oct 14, '11 00:59 |
|
Okay so deep in thought, I discovered how to time travel. And yes, I was eating a klondike bar at the time. What would I do for a klondike bar? Open my fridge. Now to the good part. |
|
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I believe this is wrong. Earth would also have aged 65 years, but from their perspective, the thing that moves so fast wouldn't travel but just instantly teleport. |
|
| Reply by: Joey_Caresi at Oct 14, '11 12:06 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I believe what -Camzilla tried to convey but wasn't explicit, was according to accepted theories surrounding and including the theory of Relativity, as something approaches the speed of light, time will seem to slow for the object at speed. Therefore, if the object at speed, experiences the passage of 65 years at slowed time, then an object at rest would see a passage of much more than 65 years. Relatively. |
|
| Reply by: AlexKeene at Oct 14, '11 17:03 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Passes Alex her pocket protector.
"Sweetie, you forgot this at home again."
No matter what, Camzilla was still wrong. got the klondike bar out of the regrigerator? No way. Had to come out of the freezer!
As for time travel...Yeah, what she said. I can contribute no more. I failed physics, didn't take theoretical physics, and because the title of the class is "theoretical" I don't believe it deals with fact. Which is...you can't time travel without a DeLorean. |
|
| Reply by: Andrew_Paxton at Oct 14, '11 18:26 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Recently some neutrins have been discovered to be faster than light. That just fucks up the whole theory of relativity. |
|
| Reply by: Joey_Caresi at Oct 14, '11 20:15 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
joey_caresi is right (both times) |
|
| Reply by: cinematic at Oct 16, '11 11:09 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1  |
Minimum $20,000