| Oct 17 - 22:49:29 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1  |
| New Player Toggle | Started by: Chuckle on Oct 18, '11 18:34 |
|
After a brief discussion on IRC and a smattering of 'check out this member whore' threads, I believe we may have stumbled upon a solution. |
|
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I do not get why this will be needed. Whilst I understand it would be useful in terms of allowing us to help newer members, throwing love in them to make them feel wanted. Like you say, it makes coming back incog harder. Then you mention the toggle option which just makes it completely pointless. Surely then everyone is going to set up an account as incog, at least to start (which is what most do!) therefore making the option pointless as if everyone is toggling it on, and therefore making it pointless. Bit like in F1, teams spend millions to create a new part, only to have that new part copied once rolled out, therefore wasting millions of pounds. This will just waste coders time as everyone will start 'yellow' and therefore would leave us with the same status quo as now.
The majority of people who do not come back as incog now, usualy have a hint in their name, such as Jr, or II, etc. Just seems like it will end up being pointless as everyone will come back as incog... |
|
| Reply by: DanK at Oct 18, '11 18:41 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I don't really understand your argument. |
|
| Reply by: Chuckle at Oct 18, '11 19:10 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Chuckle, I have had a secondary thought to maybe advance this...perhaps each family should only be allowed to designate how many sponsers they are allowed, based on the size of their HQ? Maybe limit it to 1 sponser for every 10 total slots in the HQ. Therefore a family with a 50 HQ would be allowed 5 sponsers. This would then:
a) Make CL's think about who to make sponsers, based on game knowledge, how long they are online, how trustworthy they are
b) Reduce the amount of potential member whores as there would be less sponsers
c) Give a leader a non-fatal punishment for member whoring. Get caught doing it and they might strip you off your sponsership status, thus losing you the potential income
Just a though... |
|
| Reply by: DanK at Oct 18, '11 19:14 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The problem with that idea Dank, is that the game is a 24/7 game, hard coding in the number of sponsors you can have based on HQ size effectively means you are now bound by the schedules of just a few people. I think not limiting it and leaving that aspect like it is now gives the CLs full control over what happens. |
|
| Reply by: Squishy at Oct 18, '11 22:48 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I see one problem here, and the current game events make it even more so.
While doing this will clarify who the new players are and help them get help and settled down... it also will flag returning players. In particular ones who might be trying to start playing a new type of character without being labled by the old way they were seen.
This is very relevant right now, since there is a group of players who have been blacklisted and will need to change their names and ways if they want to survive.
Knowing that their characters are not new, is one more step towards identifying them.
I'd think long and hard if flagging new users is worth the impact of removing the protective blanket away from returning players. |
|
| Reply by: TimThomas at Oct 18, '11 23:26 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
That is why there is a way for returning users to flag themselves as if they were new. Hence the toggle option. |
|
| Reply by: DixonThomasHurgood at Oct 18, '11 23:30 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
"Knowing that their characters are not new, is one more step towards identifying them." |
|
| Reply by: Squishy at Oct 19, '11 00:38 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Ok, Let me say this about that.
DOH!
that will teach me to pay more attention to the original post than the last.
Chuckle, my appologies :) |
|
| Reply by: TimThomas at Oct 19, '11 02:31 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Squisy, I agree the game is 24/7, and a limit on sponsers would make leaders think more when designating them. They would be crazy to make all sponsers be living in GMT time zone for example. They would need trusted people throughout the timezones around the world. Just like in theory, a leader should have a RHM in the opposite timezone as themselves to ensure the crew has someone online longer. But that comes down to leaders choice. If they decide that all there sponsers are in a single timezone, they have made that decision and therefore can not moan if they are missing out on potential members who join at 3am GMT, as it was there choice. All I am trying to do is force the leaders to think about their actions more, rather then make every tom, dick n arry a sponser. |
|
| Reply by: DanK at Oct 19, '11 07:34 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I like this suggestion as it's really helping both sides here, for one you will hopefully not get spammed to shit when you sign back up, and it helps the ones who are accustomed to our ways help the newer players, not by whoring them to their family, but at least telling them what they need to do in order to be safe. |
|
| Reply by: AgentVX at Oct 20, '11 08:25 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1  |
Minimum $20,000