This will be the final warning with this lot before they are just removed from the game.  

Your echo chamber of conspiracy is just feeding into your delusions that everyone is out to get you. I can't tell if your conversations are fueled by hatred, by ignorance, by trying to fit in, or you just are a little off in the way that you think and you are easily manipulated by others or maybe even by your own fears based upon projections of what you would do if you were in their shoes.

In the slim chance it is by ignorance, let me reword my previous post so that you can make better informed decisions.

Most of our rules come down to a matter of intent.  Please consider the following examples:

A) Sharing a meme of a cat falling off the bed while high on catnip is in itself an innocent act.

B) Sharing a meme of a cat falling off the bed while high on catnip to one person with the purpose of obtaining geo-location of the visitor to figure out where they are to aid in figuring out who they are is not an innocent act and will result in being removed from the game.

Does this make sense so far?  Yes? Now good, lets move on.

Does this mean that everyone who shares a meme of a cat falling off the bed while high on catnip needs to be removed from the game? Or only those who are doing Example B?

Great, sane people will see that Example B is the problem. Lets move on.

If you do not like the person who is sharing the meme of a cat falling off the bed, and you lay out the accusation that they are doing it with the purpose of obtaining geo-data, does it make it true?  Do we regress to the Salem Catnip trials and burn everyone at the pyre who has a finger cast their direction by an angry competitor?  

An admin not killing/banning another player because you made an accusation of with 0 proof, does not make the conspiracy bigger or mean we are backtracking on our rules, it means that I am not joining into your conspiracy echo chamber and wacking someone just because someone with an axe to grind decides to level an accusation based on nothing more than "its what I assume they would do because its what I would do".

When we do not kill/ban for you, I see it simply furthered the conspiracy for you guys, you have effectively moved the goal posts even further.

How does this end?  At what point do goal posts stop getting moved and common sense kicks in?  Do we need to have an "MR Official ______  (insert service here)" for every possible internet service so that you you can safely assume that this intoxicated cat is not really an intoxicated trojan horse?   Would it even matter?  I could spend hundred of thousands of hours making internal MR versions of all the popular services so that we can control all data coming in and out - and I have a feeling the goal posts would just be moved again.

So now what?  Do we cut out the cancer?  Do we cut out the conspiracy theorists who are trying their hardest to grasp at straws because all they can see is conspiracy everywhere they look?  

I don't have the mental bandwidth to deal with this shit any more.  Its tiresome.  I can't keep up with goalposts powered by Roombas.

Shoot who you don't like, or show *any proof* of your accusations, until then I will not be your weapon to kill who you do not like simply because you point fingers and yell that they could possibly do the thing that you think they they could because its something that you would do.