{I don't care about wack speed; I would just like confirmation that this isn't a viable change so that it can be closed.}

{You may not care but others do.

Is it viable probably, anything is potentially viable if you put enough time and effort into something then it is doable. Will it fuck other things up, without a doubt it will.}

{Good for them - they can consider that when/if it gets round to voting on this.

However, as we suspect this isn't a viable change (given the knock on effect and time required) confirmation from a coder of that will mean this can be closed and thus removed from clogging up the PC, invalidating that whole discussion.}

{After reading this discussion, I'd most likely withdraw my sponsorship for the idea.

I don't think it is really needed, as it has been proved to only happen very rarely. As Grin has said, too much time would be spent on this when it could be spent on more important things.

Always worth taking it to a vote though, instead of just closing the thread off completely without voting.}

Having sat and read through this entire discussion, I have to state i'm not in favour of altering the current set up.

The shot is an extremely rare one and I see no reason time should be devoted to altering it and possibly hampering other areas as a result.

Doesn't look like we're going to get any further coding clarification on this.

I will open the voting tomorrow.

If anyone has any further thoughts, please make them known.