| Sep 22 - 04:39:24 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 |
| Are women just better? | Started by: YaYa on Sep 06, '08 19:22 |
|
See, this started out, questioning if women were better, brought up by who's sitting at the top positions at this time, unless I, AGAIN got it wrong. Yet i see the word "whore" come up ever-so-often. If there are female players in here that actually track down the male leaders and engages in sexual activities with them IRL or manages to manipulate them through e-sexing to get a better rank, then I say they deserve it. Bloody brilliantly done. I've tried repitedly but seem to fail. Now onwards. The best leaders I have been under have been women. Every time I can recall, and allways with strong men to back them up. I've never seen them as superior but neither do I see them inferior because of gender. Some people are morons, others are not and a select few are geniuses. Those seem to start becoming extinct. PLEASE get it through your skulls that if there is such a thing as destiny, it is not decided on what you've got between your legs. Now if you've got a need to list up reasons why one is better than the other I suggest you let Al Murray do it for you and save your breath. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uL7QDy_NCqY Zat ist all, ya. |
|
| Reply by: LJzorz at Sep 11, '08 22:12 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Hmmm...you're a strange fellow. Is that some sort of weird dialect you speak? http? That really twists the tongue and I have no idea what it means. The parts that I DID understand, perhaps I can help you figure out. The reason "whores" came up now and then, is because it is felt by some that if you use the stupidity of men as a rope to climb to the top, then you are not really qualified as a "great" leader. To be great, it is usually believed that you must make unique contributions, overcome adversity time after time, be shrewd, and have a knack for solving problems by whatever means. Being a trollop is not adequate to fall within the description of being great. I completely agree that skill is unrelated to what is between your legs. My contention is that it is demeaning to the women who actually are competent, intelligent, and skillful, to share the same status as some bimbo who doesn't know her ass from a hole in the ground, but charmed the proper pathetic, desperate, horny men in to be given credibility and opportunities that are not deserved. Do not take this assessment the wrong way. Personally, I do not blame women at all. It is usually the men's fault. Rarely do you see a woman use her femininity to climb the ladder to success. The flirtatious type of woman is just flirtatious because it is fun - and there is nothing wrong with that. What happens is that the pathetic douchebag of a man, ever trying to find new ways to gain favor with the object of his desire, uses whatever influence he has to boost the woman's position in La Cosa Nostra. And why wouldn't she accept it? Again, this description only applies to some. There are and have been many great female leaders who used the same intelligence, skill, experience, and knowledge that their male counterparts have used, and they have done it well. To answer the main question then - are women better? No. Sexual genitalia does not make one better or worse. |
|
| Reply by: FlyingPig at Sep 11, '08 22:30 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Pardon my...... French there, FP. I do react on one of your claims though: "boost the woman's position in La Cosa Nostra." Women in the 1930s and so up for a fairly long time (and possibly still) are not allowed to hold positions within La Cosa Nostra. I cannot speak for all syndicates but La Cosa Nostra never allowed women (to my knowlege) inside. The only possitions were unofficial consiglierie's, goomars (mistresses) and the like. Now being as it is and women having quite a bit of power in here, I do not blame them for (ab)using some men's inability in certain areas, i stated it before: brilliantly done. it is a basic law: Surivival of the fittest. "The right of the strong" it's called where I'm from On as what makes a great leader, I have to dissagree. If the only really strong skill one holds is a sexual domination over the other sex then one is not a great leader. If one however makes unique and strong contributions to one's friends and family, overcome adversity, prefferably together with the family and DOES have a knack for solving both everyday and unusual problems, then one has a good start at greatness. Anyways, just my thoughts, my oppinion which will surley change if i live long enough. Not absolute truth. You'll have to go somewhere else for that |
|
| Reply by: LJzorz at Sep 11, '08 23:07 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 |
How much do you want to tip for this post?
Minimum $20,000
Minimum $20,000
