| Oct 01 - 07:40:17 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2  |
| Posting Anonymously | Started by: PlayerCommission on Jan 17, '13 02:27 |
|
I am a fan of the feature if it isn't abused and oversight is solid with reporting of checks made against posts clear for admins to see. |
|
| Reply by: PC-El_Nino at Jan 29, '13 16:58 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
{Remember what we have suffered with people showing their face to us with criticism, it can only get worse and personal. Personal attacks are very hard to judge, and so there should be no extra opportunity for them, as malice can only be bred behind that mask, nothing constructive.} |
|
| Reply by: PC-SpikeSpiegel at Feb 01, '13 05:43 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
{There is that side of it, however one thing our game has always suffered with is the inability for OOC to be kept OOC and that is the massive shame of the site as a whole. There will be built in to the feature an ability to report posts from there it is down to you explain why you consider it a personal attack} |
|
| Reply by: PC-El_Nino at Feb 01, '13 09:58 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The voting for this suggestion has passed. PC-El_Nino has voted YES. [4] (Carefully moderated both ways it reinforces the OOC side of our game) PC-Flash-Fire has voted YES. [3] (Helps people who want to make a comment in an OOC thread without risking their incog.) PC-Pratster has voted YES. [2] (People will still be acountable, there will be checks in place. Reinforces OOC part of OOC forum.) PC-ralph has voted YES. [2] (Strictly monitored and provides a bit of protection to speak freely without being punished in-game for it - I'm for it.) PC-Sticks has voted YES. [2] (Freedom of speech is vital when it comes to this world. Being afraid of voicing your opinion should never be a problem. People opposing this simply want control over their people.) PC-Warrior has voted YES. [2] (Finally allows OOC to be actually OOC. Good change imo.) PC-Whitey has voted YES. [2] (Freedom of speech - only to be judged by the admins. All for it.) PC-Cassiopeia has voted NO. [5] (Plenty of other avenues to remain anonymous without going to these lengths) PC-DeadlySin has voted NO. [2] (People should always be accountable for their words. There are also ways of posting without you doing it yourself already.) PC-SpikeSpiegel has voted NO. [2] (Definitely not. Hateful speech words are too likely, and that's not something that can be judged by a higher power, only the person it's against.) PC-Adrian has not voted. [2] PC-Lola has not voted. [2] PC-Patti has not voted. [2] PC-Ter has not voted. [2] Voting Totals, Yes: 17 (7), No: 9 (3), Undecided: 8 (4). PC-ralph, it is now your responsibility to write a final summary for the coders and to create/edit the wiki article for the suggestion. |
|
| Reply by: PlayerCommission at Feb 03, '13 17:44 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
This suggestion enables anonymous posts squarely in the OOC forum with heavy guidelines for posting that are deferred to the administrators to set; in addition, it includes a feature to report anonymous posts that can automatically remove the comment if it reaches a certain threshold. This feature is to be held to the same standard that the "Report Profile" has, and should not be used lightly. This feature would not apply to non-anonymous posts. |
|
| Reply by: PC-ralph at Feb 05, '13 16:29 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2  |
Minimum $20,000