Lets keep praying they get obliterated by the U.S drones, maybe, hopefully they can get a nuke dropped on them.

Whilst I obviously agree that we don't need people of this ilk, I would suggest we that refrain from comments regarding the religion in general. Many people follow Alah that are not terrorists, we can't put them all in the same box. There are Christian terrorists out there too like the IRA (and others i'm sure) so lets not be silly about it.

I honestly don't see nukes as the answer, between wind spread, innocents injured, maimed, long term effect of radiation on future residents I see it as creating more future animosity.  The biggest danger with terrorists and dissidents is they mix within the general populace and could be anyone, so is hard to know who will suffer by their actions or even who the targets are.

but what about all the ISIS members who are coming from different countries who chose to betray their leaders, how would you know who they are and stop them?

what if they decide to stay in our country slowly building followers?

If you genuinely think nukes are the answer, I wouldn't even leave you alone with a bottle of Windex unsupervised, in case you drank it. 

Nukes are never the answer. I think Carlos adequately covered why tbh.

Aye, Carlos got a lot of the reasons. Lets not be forgetting the fact that it's likely that with the tensions and politics globally today, for America or whoever to nuke ISIS gives Russia the okay to nuke Ukraine, Israel to nuke whoever the fuck they want, Pakistan and India to nuke each other... do we really want to risk setting that precedent? 

Not to mention that IS militants are so dispersed and sparse you'd need to drop several nukes across the whole of the Middle East in order to even so much as scratch the surface. That's... problematic to say the least.

It's an issue of great interest to me, given it's my dominant topic of study at present. Sadly, there is literally no right answer to the problem of IS. Each perceived solution has major pitfalls. Their aim from the start has been to draw the West, particularly the US and UK, into another very, very bloody Middle Eastern conflict. If NATO go in all guns blazing, it just looks like yet another Western attempt to exert influence on the Middle East. It also plays very nicely into IS' warped notion of martyrdom, and the feeling of Western occupation will keep their recruitment drive ticking along. If you don't go in, they continue to grow. Simple as that. IS have control of some oil supplies and their militants are very well stocked in terms of arms. In comparison, the Kurds are running out of ammunition and the Iraqi army are quite frankly terrible.

The airstrikes of the past few weeks are a vain attempt to stop a ground operation, but it's pretty damn clear they're not helping the situation in the slightest. Look at the current situation in Kobane in Syria, right on the Turkish border. The US are trying to push IS back with strikes but the Kurds keep losing ground regardless, and it's a matter of time before IS capture the place. What happens afterwards? If IS then attack Turkey directly it provides an obligation for NATO to respond definitively, given Turkey is a NATO member state. What does that mean? A major aim of IS is fulfilled. A long, protracted guerrilla war.

The West are doing all they can to stay out of it. I get the feeling it'll all be in vain, but at least this time it'll have the backing of major Arab nations.

I highly doubt that ISIS would attack Turkey or make any efforts to open a third front in their back.
ISIS/IS has been controlling the area in northern Syria where the tomb of Suleyman Shah [The founder of Ottoman empire] since 2013. 
Since then in order to supply the Turkish garrison guarding the Tomb inside Syria, the Turkish army convoy has been given permission to pass through ISIS-controlled territories and check points.

Turkey is also preventing Syria from helping Kobane by shooting at any Syrian Jet that has attempted to help YPG in Kobane.
 

I forgot to mention that ISIS has systematically blown up every shrine and tomb in their territory, including Jonah's.

Kal El, it might have something to do with the fact they have beheaded people? Just saying.

so if your not against them and dont hate them, then you must be for them right?