I've noticed that, when you're the person that initiates a JB, that you are able to neatly organize all the prisoners by the number of guards, name, time left, etc. I've also noticed that, with the Lockdown Share program, that the person to contribute the first percentage is the one whose chosen as the 'initiator,' which doesn't feel quite fair if he/she contributed .25 credits and another person contributed .75 credits. My proposal is that, whoever contributes the biggest percentage becomes the lockdown initiator. If there is a tie (i.e., two people contribute .50 or 4 people each put up .25) then the people in the tie are both named initiator, and get the benefits.

I definitely think that is a good idea. It seems like that would be a bit more fair to everyone!

Never knew the .25 initial contributor is seen in the same light as one who splashes the full 1.0 credits. I just thought they were being helpful. Would make more sense to have it more balanced.

I can understand where you are coming from but in reality the person to invest in the lock down first has the least chance of actually participating in said lock down. Unless you have a group of people that are throwing quite a few jails the first person to throw down on a lock down usually has to wait quite some time before they actually get to start busting. I'd say all those that contributed to the lock down should get the sorted jail. 

I'm almost positive I've had sorting on shared jails, Squishy.

The way you get sorting on shared jails is to first launch a full crackdown for one credit, then when you still have sorted jails contributed to the shared pot. You'll get a shared jail but still keep your sorting.