| Oct 10 - 22:51:31 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1 |
| CAs | Started by: Skorpeon on Dec 08, '15 14:59 |
|
Can we make replying to mails from CA's anonymous? Some people message CA's so then they hope for a reply and they can have the character name revealed. I don't care myself, but some don't like others knowing what CA's they employ. |
|
| Report Post | Tip |
| Sounds like a opening for abuse and misuse. | |
| Reply by: Avery at Dec 08, '15 16:03 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The mail could still be reported though, Avery. Admins are able to see these things if they so desire in cases of abuse. More to the point, perhaps the users who abuse it should grow up and act like adults? I know my initial point mentioned the admins but it's really quite sad that so much of their time goes into having to police the userbase when they could be doing things that they would like to be, in order to benefit the game. Also if someone abuses you anonymously through their CA and won't stop it, perhaps just shoot the CA? |
|
| Reply by: RoryRourke at Dec 08, '15 16:18 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
That person could have spent real money to get that CA. |
|
| Reply by: JackFranco at Jan 06, '16 00:56 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| I'm all for making the identity of the actual user sending a CA letter anonymous. It would help me immensley. Abusive mails can be reported and the CA owner can be verified by the administration | |
| Reply by: Jeddy at Jan 06, '16 17:02 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I would be more inclined to make CA mails 100% anonymous if I gave the users the ability to police abuse themselves and only escalate if it breaks the game rules. So, if a CA and a person developed a relationship (have mailed), then there is trust, and therefor, its easy to kill the CA because their guard is down. So if you want anonymous CA mails, then its 100% success rate if the person you mailed wants to shoot your CA with no retaliation from any other CA. |
|
| Reply by: Squishy at Jan 07, '16 16:56 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
If I'm reading this right I like it. I have a CA. Mr. Doe MMs my CA, and I reply. Mr. Doe doesn't know who the CA belongs to. However, if Mr. Doe shoots the CA, he will have a 100% chance of hitting, and will have no retaliation. Am I correct? If so, I like it. I know of members of families who don't train guns. They want to give their CA kill to a family hitter, so they have to figure out how to fire the CA, get the hitter there, take the shot, etc. This would offer a convenient way to handle this issue. Only worry thought: I get a MM to my CA. I reply. My CA gets immediately shot. People could spam all CAs hoping for a reply just for free kills. Not a big issue, I wouldn't think, as we would know who did it (the guy who messaged the CA). |
|
| Reply by: Luca_Pacioli at Jan 07, '16 17:58 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| I'm not against the change, but I'm not a fan of using your CA for anonymous communication, if you choose to use it anonymously there should be a down side. | |
| Reply by: Squishy at Jan 07, '16 23:54 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1 |
Minimum $20,000
