Make an option for MUC's to rob ppl casionos,
but also make it so you can buy BG's to protect your casino.

Your personal BG's and casiono BG's would be compleatly seperate.

How dose this sound?

I don't mind this idea, it sounds quite exciting. It would obviously be used in the midst of war, total annihilation of the opposition!

I think this is a great idea. Maybe it should require a 10 man minimum and only be for families.

This addition would probably not even be used in the most part - likely being outlawed.

Majority of the casinos are owned by GFs and it would be unlikely for the GFs to allow the people of their city to go around knocking over other GFs casinos as it could be a catalyst for war. And no one really wants to go to war so each GF will likely put a ban on its members from using this MUC so it would be worthless coding for it to then be banned by the GFs in power.

This has been suggested multiple times in the past, normally getting exactly RF's reply (commonly given by me).

There is no benefit to having an option coded that will be used so rarely that it's a total waste of time.

Casino's already provide a very slow payback for owners. If this was introduced at a level where it was easy to rob and with low risks of being caught, it would lead to the casino options being removed from the game as owners would simply remove funds from the vault. If it was at a level where the risks were high and it required a lot of skill, nobody would ever use it due to the fact that they'd be killed for it. Either way, a big negative.

I was hoping this would be a suggestion to refer to a Casino as a Casiono from now on. Disappointment.

This is an interesting idea but just like what RF and Deimne says,

this will be banned by leaders means its worthless to be implemented.

and Gwarble i think it is typo so dont be disappointed.

I was joking.

I guess that it could be used during war, to try to get the money from the city you're taking over. A little bonus to help you with the aftermath. But other than that, it would never be used.

Also, why not add another "o" to casino? You can never have tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many o's!