May 16 - 07:20:49 |
|
Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1 2 3 [ > - >>> ] |
Forum Posting Perks - My take on it | Started by: enkindle on Nov 29, '12 20:39 |
In my view, the one key problem with the idea of automatically rewarding people for posting is spam. Yeah, I know people can enforce a no spam policy but I guarantee the overall post quality with go down as the post count goes up purely because of all the people that will feel compelled to post just to earn the reward, in order to stay competitive with the other players who actually enjoy posting... That was a long sentence. |
|
Report Post | Tip |
Oh, one other thought. We can, but don't have to, show on the post how many people have praised it. Or we could show how much money the poster earned on it. I think showing the total amount would be cool, would show people that posts do earn. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Nov 29, '12 20:44 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I think that this is the most original and best idea of the bunch! The idea is nothing like "facebook" you gain nothing from a facebook like except some form of popular acceptance. |
|
Reply by: AnnieWilkes at Nov 29, '12 22:31 | |
Report Post | Tip |
|
|
Reply by: PC-Whitey at Nov 30, '12 05:07 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I like this in theory... But who's to say people will or won't "praise" it because someone is their friend or someone they don't like? |
|
Reply by: PC-Cassiopeia at Nov 30, '12 06:06 | |
Report Post | Tip |
{None of that needed to be redacted, but its fun to use, isn't it?} |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Nov 30, '12 06:09 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I would send cash to anyone liked or not liked if they made a good post. Although I would probably donate more if they were someone I liked. |
|
Reply by: AnnieWilkes at Dec 01, '12 13:52 | |
Report Post | Tip |
What's stopping the poster from transferring 5,000,000 to a friend to praise his post with it? |
|
Reply by: Phil_Steak at Dec 01, '12 16:12 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Oh, sorry Cassi, I completely missed your post last time. With this system, it does not matter if its only their friends they reward? It costs them the cash they send. The point is that they can't game the system in order to get the reward given. Which would happen. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Dec 01, '12 16:34 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I like this system, provided the *only* benefit they got was the money from the people that like their post. |
|
Reply by: PC-DeadlySin at Dec 01, '12 19:39 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I don't know about it being private. The goal is to encourage people to post. Seeing that people get rewarded, does just that. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Dec 01, '12 21:02 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I love this. Whitey, I would give use it. Many times I have wanted to praise people who hae posted certain things, but politics have kept me from being able to do so in any sort of public fashion. Im not saying I will give anyone millions for a post, but 10k or something, im completely for it.
also, why is all this stuff being redacted again? |
|
Reply by: Pumpkins at Dec 01, '12 21:18 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Nothing important was redacted, we were continuing a private conversation in a rather odd place. I think Whitey was just having fun with a new toy. {It's fun after all.} Now, you have no choice but to be curious as hell. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Dec 01, '12 21:50 | |
Report Post | Tip |
{It really is fun, and you are quite evil. Love it.} |
|
Reply by: PC-DeadlySin at Dec 01, '12 22:24 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I agree with DeadlySin on this one, I think that the money you get from a praise should be just that...the money someone gets from a praise is enough. |
|
Reply by: AnnieWilkes at Dec 01, '12 22:30 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Also if people liked that idea, I would reccomend the user having to reach a certain criteria before they were allowed to charge for threads. Possibley having to reach a certain amount of Threads/Posts first or do it by rank. |
|
Reply by: AnnieWilkes at Dec 01, '12 22:32 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Charging people to view threads would only discourage people from visiting... exactly the opposite of what we want ;) |
|
Reply by: PC-DeadlySin at Dec 01, '12 22:35 | |
Report Post | Tip |
DS, I believe, don't quote me on it, that my original idea included optional (and default on) anonymity. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Dec 01, '12 22:36 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Sorry but I have to disagree with theory entirely. I beleive that the object or rather the theory of objectivity of opinion should be free of any cost or limitation and the fact that someone might agree or dis-agree with it is of equal importance.
Whether the opinion is long (winded) or not does not necassarily decrease the value of that persons opinion. There will always be people that will take advantage of the way a system is set up to run.
This is just my opinion! |
|
Reply by: greenthumbs1 at Dec 02, '12 12:00 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I don't see what opinion has to do here? This is generic, for any and every post. And there is nothing to take advantage of? Nothing is gained that another player doesn't have to pay. |
|
Reply by: enkindle at Dec 02, '12 17:15 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1 2 3 [ > - >>> ] |
Minimum $20,000