| Sep 22 - 04:40:08 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1 2 [ > - >>> ] |
| Yesterday, Today & Probably Tomorrow | Started by: Gwarble on Jul 18, '10 12:12 |
|
As you can imagine, I have had a long few days at the office. Despite this, I feel I owe those fallen mobsters from New York, St Louis and let us not kid ourselves here, from Philly, Los Angeles, Chicago, New Orleans and Las Vegas as well. This was truly a conflict that touched every area of our business and has affected every facet of Cosa Nostra as a result.
|
|
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The reason Gwarble is because a high majority of the members in St.Louis started out in NewYork. And there was probably hatred from when LA went to war with Philly. |
|
| Reply by: Baliac at Jul 18, '10 12:48 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
A high majority of everybody started out in New York. It's nice to see that some people still understand that when you start a new family, you become independent. This recent war was a beautiful thing in my eyes. I have no animosity towards New York, and never have, but I liked to see that there are mobsters who still desire the conquest for power and who claim their own territory rather than continue to live in the shadow of another. These are old mafia tenets that seem to get forgotten lately. |
|
| Reply by: CharlesBarkley at Jul 18, '10 12:57 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I Guess you are alittle bit right Charles it was a actually cool war. |
|
| Reply by: Baliac at Jul 18, '10 13:07 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Yeah, really cool. Time spent learning the ways of our world, people who had been alive for longer than I care to remember were wiped out, many lives lost on both sides. "Cool" isn't the word I'd use to describe wars at the best of times, let alone one that has been catastrophic in losses for both parties.
Thank you for shedding light on your own actions though Gwarble. |
|
| Reply by: Squire at Jul 18, '10 13:13 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I shouldn't really have said "cool" I should have said Exciting. My Bad. |
|
| Reply by: Baliac at Jul 18, '10 13:18 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Nah, you were right. It was cool. |
|
| Reply by: CharlesBarkley at Jul 18, '10 13:21 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
i have one question to whoever the hell wants to answer.
their is a crewleader in Las Vegas who has been there for some time now. why is it that, dispite the fact that he has put in good service, he was supplanted as head of the city? was he consulted in this move? and why was he not allowed to progress at his own rate? |
|
| Reply by: alfieri at Jul 18, '10 13:53 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Robert or Richard? |
|
| Reply by: Baliac at Jul 18, '10 13:56 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
richard. |
|
| Reply by: alfieri at Jul 18, '10 13:56 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
There is no law stating that Las Vegas was to be left alone until Richard got to Godfather. |
|
| Reply by: StupidRedTie at Jul 18, '10 13:58 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I can agree with much of what you say, Gwarble, but I don't agree with trashing St.Louis for fighting for what they thought was right. Now maybe New Orleans and Chicago will come out here at some point and lay out some flimsy excuse for their involvement but the truth is (especially after looking over some mails with Iota my kin had left behind) that NO and CH took what they thought was the easiest path to saving their own skin while St. Louis took the path they thought was right. I'm not saying that CH or NO should be put down for the path they chose but St. Louis certainly shouldn't either. |
|
| Reply by: Blutarsky at Jul 18, '10 14:00 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
i just want to know why this desicion was made |
|
| Reply by: alfieri at Jul 18, '10 14:00 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
alfieri, if Godfather Guiscard choices to explain it to you, then youll know. You're in no position to be demanding anything, from anyone. |
|
| Reply by: StupidRedTie at Jul 18, '10 14:04 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I've said before that there should never be 'doing the right thing'. The right thing is whatever keeps you and your family alive and what is best for their business interests. If you're a leader, in any profession not just ours, your duty is to your members. Launching your city headlong in a failed bid to save a falling empire can only ever be judged by the outcome, which in this case was disaster. This was war and in war, the only crime is to lose. |
|
| Reply by: Gwarble at Jul 18, '10 14:12 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
From reading my fathers' journal entries there was no reason for St. Louis to join the war. At the very best they should have remained neutral, but reading back through the journal's there were many mess ups in the St. Louis structure of command. Not only did they authorize leaders to step up that were completely inactive they never disciplined them either. They left it to their right and left hand men to carry the families and usually it was only a few people that did the work. |
|
| Reply by: Sc0pe_D0pe at Jul 18, '10 14:29 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
You're free to run your city as you see fit. If "doing the right thing" doesn't matter to you then that's fine. That's your prerogative. Other leaders have felt differently and I don't agree with trashing them simply because their view on the matter differed from yours. |
|
| Reply by: Blutarsky at Jul 18, '10 14:32 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
sc0pe, are you referring to haydubs? |
|
| Reply by: alfieri at Jul 18, '10 14:35 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
HayDubs, SINGER, TheSandman even. Neither spent more than an hour or so a day with their families at a time. HayDubs was under different terms, but he still was inactive. |
|
| Reply by: Sc0pe_D0pe at Jul 18, '10 14:53 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The only right thing to me is what is right for business and in war, the right thing is the thing that leads you to win. If other leaders feel differently to that then they need to evaluate their thinking. |
|
| Reply by: Gwarble at Jul 18, '10 14:54 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1 2 [ > - >>> ] |
Minimum $20,000