Louis_T, respect is earned.

Dean's point is valid but the responsibility lays with you to show that sometimes, a new life can be different and that the son can learn from the errors of their fathers.

I have given you an opportunity where some may not have. I look forward to seeing your progress.

Garou - you won't be disappointed.

Ah Garou is a good friend of mine, if he is going to give you a chance, who am I to stand in the way of that.

Thank you, DeanWinchester-

Oxygene looked at a battered book of legal terms removed from the dusty cellars of the Scroggin house.  Small notes had been made in the margins, pictures of boobs and willies were drawn on the inside pages and  fine strands of hair were stuck to some pages like wispy spiderwebs.  A coffee cup ring adorned the front cover, proof that the book was more often used as a coaster than a book of reference but he flicked through it...little puffs of what he hoped was just dust billowed up causing his nose to tickle.

Resting his finger on a page, Oxygene walked out to where Taradiddle_ was standing.

The phrase you are looking for is falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. also contradictio in adjecto  I have heard that Topperson would have laughed this out of court, even if the reasoning was presented in Latin. 

Topperson would have thrown him in the Seattle jail I think.

Baa got some say here. Brutus is peddling backwards. Probably all in the name of  the current state of affairs. This is still no excuse. 

The old saying goes, "the proof is in the pudding".   

Well, this pudding is awful thick, and I still don't see any proof.

"Since your father was no threat, I don't feel that Brutus had a duty to disarm your father, as he had a less than one percent chance of harming anyone. " ~Wayne

The first step is always disarm. You can 1% someone. Any risk should be eliminated. You'd think differently if he had whacked someone. Hindsight is 20/20.

Brutus made a big mistake. It was very poor judgment. It was the wrong call.

Wrong.