Kirsty decides to make use of her degree in psychology to assess the mindset of the anonymous hit-lister.

"I know from years spent listening to men who have spent time in prison more than most do about male psychology.  And it is surely a man who is hit-listing, and, more than that, a very specific type of man.

This man will suffer from extreme, debilitating and obvious erectile dysfunction (ED).  Now, most men have, or will, suffer from ED at some point in their lives.  My late father suffered from it the first time he attempted to "turn out" his very first "prison punk."  For a time he thought he might  be a catcher, rather than a pitcher, but he persevered, and turned out his very first punk, Adam, who spent a few years being the only warmth in a cold cell for my father.  

Any many more men in my life have described episodic ED.  A friend of the family, let's call him "Stephen", once discussed how we "got lucky" with a woman at party, and they went back to hers around 7am.  "Stephen" and the young woman retired to her bedroom to take things to the next level, but 18 hours of extremely heavy drinking had taken its toll, and whilst his spirit was strong, his flesh was weak.  Their union remained unconsummated.  Luckily for "Stephen" however, the woman in question was a regular at the bar he worked at, so he got to see her, and her friends, several times a week for the next year.

Again, that type of ED is not like that suffered by the hit-lister.

The hit-lister will literally never have achieved erection, let alone orgasm.  In his stunted psychosexuality, he will imagine that someone else's gun being used will bring him salvation.

But it won't.  His own gun is useless.  It can't be fired.  It will never be fired.  He will never achieve the manly pursuits that he craves.

So he used a different way - he uses the hitlist.

He can't even talk another man into doing his bidding.  He has to pay.  And even then, the gun isn't fired.

So he is never satisfied.  

So why does he continue?

You lost me after claiming to be able to use your psychological skills on an anonymous individual..

I will try again after a good sleep..

I must admit, I did not listen any further than the first line, in which I feel you fully contradicted yourself, with which you clearly don't agree, but deep down inside your intellectual mind you know I actually am Right, Right?

Saying I am Right, I don't have to use the word 'surely', which proves that you have assumed in the gender of the hitlister. Only therefore we can conclude that your evaluation basically is a guess. Are you sure a woman can't hitlist? Because I know from first hand that this is untrue. It has happened, it will happen. Or do you feel the female hitlisters in fact are male?

You say the hitlister has an erectile dysfunction?

Right shakes his head and sighs

How often do women use such a point on their account? I am sure your intellectual mind is aware of the Klinefelter syndrome, so I won't describe that any further.. My familyline has seen crewleaders hitlist people, they have seen people with big cannons hitlist people as well.

Scraping his throat, Right continues

Again, I did not listen past he first few words, but as I did now, which I felt obliged to, as you intonated you actually having cognitive skills which I lack, I was terribly disappointed.

Right tries to pull a sad face, looks to his Left and Right and see noone actually interprets it Right, so he speaks on

You don't even bring any psychologics to the table. In fact, you only assume things to insult an anonymous person on the streets.
In my humble, apparently less cognitive, yet Right opinion, I would say that if anything is to be derived from what or who the hitlister is, I would say..

He, or she, is rich.

You being someone with a degree in psychology, I truely admire your efforts in hiding your intelligence. I can't say I am smart, but you must know I am Right. And will always be Right.

It is worth noting, Right, that one of the purposes of behavioral psychology is to gain insight based on observations. The subject can be as anonymous as they like, so your implication that this does not qualify as psychology because you cannot identify the person is misjudged. There is a clear pattern of behavior, from which we can infer plenty of things, such as the fact these guys kiss their sisters on the mouth. 

Right smiles at Zapata

There is a difference in an anonymous subject in psychology being a person that is actually observed, yet remains anonymous in the documentation and a judgement of a stereotype. So either I am Right by saying Kirsty is not Right when using the word 'surely', or you know the actual hitlister, which you seem to do with your pseudo-near-incestuous observance of the anonymous subject. Then I would say: Call a spade a spade.

As a side note, I have never seen a spade kiss another spade and I don't feel that they should when they are siblings.

When a psychologist comes in to work the case of a serial killer, they do not know who it is. Their conclusions will be drawn from the evidence put before them and shaped into a psychological profile. The evidence here is that dozens of anonymous hits totaling nearly 700 million dollars have been placed on Grin-07 and The Grin Gang to little effect. What that tells me is that if you ran into these guys in the backwoods of Georgia, they would be barking orders for you to 'squeal like a piggy' while their sisters take a breather from all that incestuous frenching. 

I really don't see the point you are trying to make. I get that there has been a lot of money invested in the hitlisting. But is that your only 'evidence'? A psychological profile can never be drawn from just a single, anonymous happening. How can only that evidence lead you to say that someone spending loads of money on something that clearly is annoying to Grin-07 and his gang, is from Georgia and fancies his sister?

The fact that someone either spends all of his money, or a fraction of it (we apparently do not know), on a hitlist, which in itself is an accepted and viable way of warfare, leads the both of you to conclude that his gender is male and that he fancies his sister? Oh.. And Kirsty even knows he has erectile problems.

Realistically, Zapata, there is no possible psychogical 'profile' that would make that scientifically viable. Even in soft science like psychology.

There is only one conclusion to this thread and that is that Kirsty draws conclusions from emotions.

Apologies, Right, I may have presented too narrow of an abstract for the psychological profile I have drawn from my observations. Sometimes I get ahead of myself. I should have made it clear from the beginning that in between kissing their sisters, there is still plenty of time for them to kiss their cousins too. 

Right - it is clear that you are unfamiliar with psychological profiling.  The newly formed FBI are experimenting with this type of detective work.  But let us refer to our shared history.  We all remember the so-called "Unknown Assailants" - their modus operandi was training a gun, walking up to ranking members of this thing of ours and shooting bodyguards.  They trained themselves to be stealthy, but still ran the risk of being caught.  These men, and it was exclusively men, could be profiled by their actions:

Dedicated

Hardworking

Daring

Brave

Heterosexual (except for one bisexual)

Now, if we look at hit-listing - and if we understand nuance and psychology, then we can clearly see that the individual placing these hits is a deeply frustrated man, with extreme ED and penis envy, unwilling and/or incapable of actually working in the way that he would like to.

You see, the man placing the hits would love to be able to shoot the people he is hit-listing, but can't.  Impotent, you see?  

Almost all serial killers are men.  Almost all war crimes are committed by men.  There are exceptions, and I will grant that there is a very slim possibility that the hitlister is a woman, but the profile that I have drawn up, and like I said, I have a degree in psychology, is that he is a deeply frustrated man, plagued by a sense of inadequacy, and that Mr Floppy hasn't stood to attention since his high school teacher scolded him for peeing in his pants in "math."

Now, Right, you have been taking a keen interest in my writings these past few days, haven't you?  OK, you may ask me anything that you like.

You don't always have to be the one profiling to be experienced in psychological profiling, Kirsty.. As of our shared history: No, I am not aware of the existence of a group named Unknown Assailants, what makes you think I would have known them?

After answering the one question asked, Right had trouble making a connection between the profile sketch of the members of said group and the hitlister, but Right knew why he had trouble making that connection. He couldn't make the connection, mainly because their was no connection.

OK, you say it's a man, you say they have a penis problem and you say they aren't influential in this world and you call them frustrated.

I call that bullshit, and I am Right. And also, I will tell you why:
I think they are pissing their (his or her) pants from laughing about the frustration you bring forward. They clearly have influence, otherwise you wouldn't have counted the amount of hitlisted money so far, otherwise Grin-07 would not have said that he would take different measures in proactive elimination of people, otherwise you wouldn't have brought up their penis..

Right looks around and adds

That was unintentional!

Now where was I?

Yes, I don't think he.. Or she, did I already mention it could be a woman, too?.. is frustrated, why would he persevere in doing what he, or she, does? I think it's the other way around, you are frustrated about it and therefore you call him frustrated. Having a degree (what degree by the way?) in psychology, I am sure you know the term for that kind of mirrored emotions, Right?

So far I have seen one characteristic of the hitlister named, and that is that he.. or she.. hitlists. The rest is.. How should I name it?

Right lifts up a finger and says, in increasing volume

blah

blah

blah

Right - you seem to revel in the deviant actions of the hit-listers.

I have put forth a psychological profile.  What you have done is constantly refer to your own given name (That Joke Isn't Funny Anymore) and then serve up a word salad so fucking stupid than even your, equally hilariously named, atrociously brained sycophant left is looking at your thinking "man make no sense.  man make no sense."

Now, Right, may I suggest that you mind your manners, and fuck off somewhere where your sub-neanderthal humour is actually appreciated?  May I suggest OOC Avenue, where you can discuss at length how many fistfights that you have got in?

Or, be an actualised human being, instead of a wretched sneak, and say what you actually feel about the hit-lists?  The hit-listers are pathetic cowards.  You are hiding behind them, son.

Make of that what you will, and don't forget who you are speaking to: Kirsty, commander of the join third largest crew in The Loop, Chicago, and de fact leader of the Streets.  Your attempts at aggression will not stand, son.  They simply won't stand.

As contentious as this is, it's important that we not overlook the fact you two have found common ground on one important theory: that these men have serious issues with peeing their pants. Could that shame be what poisons their confidence and spirals into performance issues? Could adult diapers be a point of discussion? 

In fairness, Zapata only counted the amount we've been listed for so we could compare it against Elodin's earnings to see how much more he needed to tribute for us to have bought them all off from his work alone. The answer was nearly $700,000,000.

Right.. I get it, you cannot stand I am Right, Right?

I don't defend any actions, I just feel your pseudo-scientific-profilation is garbage, I know one thing for sure, I would never got to you when I next need a psychoanalyst.

You put forth a psychological profile of a group that I never heard of and then switch onto the hitlister without any correlation? Right.

If I look at Left, who often is on my Right, so I am on his Left, he looks Left and I can tell from his eyes that that is not what he thinks. Or did you psychologically assess him about it? Or me? Right..

No, you may not suggest I mind my manners. These are The Streets, and I can give my opinion on the subject, Right?

No, you may not suggest OOC Avenue as I actually comment on your claims and I actually take it a bit further, by virtually psychologically mirroring your emotions.

What I have to say about the hitlist themselves, I don't feel it matters what I feel about it. But I disagree with you on the effects of both the hitlister and the hitlistee. How am I hiding? Am I not in The Streets?

Ah.. You are the leader of the Streets? Haven't heard anyone serious ever say that before.. Self-proclaimed? Or did you pay anyone to name you that? Which in fact, would make it the same as hitlisting, just differently. Where did I make an attempt at aggression? I just very much disagree with what you are saying. Scientific proof should have content. There is none.

Right shakes his head and can't hold his laughter

..Leader of the Streets.. Joint third largest crew of a district... It sounds like coming second in a war, to be honest..

Right.. Seriously now.. Can't you really see you accuse others of what you do yourself? Aggression.. Frustration..

I always thought having a degree in psychlogy would require at least a basic course of self-assessment..

Right - wow...  You are actually defending the Hit-listers?  That's quite a radical thing to do.  And it isn't the correct thing to do either.

"You put forth a psychological profile of a group that I never heard of and then switch onto the hitlister without any correlation?"

Your lack of historical acumen isn't my issue, it is yours.  You are incapacitating yourself by not knowing.  And there is a correlation (as you understand it, you are misusing the word).  They were groups whose behaviours could be analysed.  

That's obvious.

But let's get back to your support for the Hit-listers.  How is that correct?  How can that be justified?

All Right.. This is what I said:

What I have to say about the hitlist themselves, I don't feel it matters what I feel about it.

How does that defend the hitlister? 

Probably said group has something to do with your lineage, which I thankfully am unaware of. I could not care less about the history. I can give you an example.

An iron, for ironing, usually gets reaaly hot when you are using it for ironing.

Right waits a moment, for dramatic effect, then says

So a whisk is hot, too.

..

You don't get it, Right? Then you should listen to what you are saying.

I never defended the hitlister, did I?

If you ask my opinion about it, I say it does not matter. What I can say is that it's a legal option to hitlist people. Apparently it's effective, as it seems to freak someone out here..

You said this, right:

What I have to say about the hitlist themselves, I don't feel it matters

I feel it does matter.  It's an act of aggression, it's cowardly, and you should condemn it, not say that it doesn't matter.

It does not matter what I think about it. I stick to that. By the way, that's different from me saying the hits don't matter.. If they didn't you probably would be speaking in another tone... Or voice.. I don't know how do you say that in English, I don't care. Go find the correlation.

For your information, I have hitlisted someone the other day.
He was employed by Tyler Durden, so yeah... I use the hitlist.

It's an act of aggression, of course it is! Isn't it what this whole world is made of?

Cowardly? I get that you say that. Still, I won't give my opinion on the hitlists. If you want, I can give you an analysis of your reaction? I have more info on that than you do on the hitlister apparently..