Lemmy Kilmister could destroy Chuck Norris.

The more important question is when is this Quantum guy going to die?

Had New York wished to remove Roman we could of, however we had no reason to remove him (or at least that's what we thought).

A perfect plan

Roman will never die to answer your question, and you have to agree with SexyBeast.

Considering Bruce Lee once beat Chuck Norris, and he's dead now, does that improve or lessen Roman's invincibility?

Why didn't anyone shoot at Romans bodyguards during the war, if he is so hated?

NY COULD have got rid of Roman but they just never had the balls nor the leadership to actually go through with it.

Ah, Prem, I love you buddy, but I have to ask... how many BGs does Roman have? 500? 1000? What would killing 5 of them really do? 10? 20? Even if you could kill 100, how much would that accomplish? He'd just buy more. But the ridiculous amounts of BGs is a whole OTHER topic.

Stallion, as a neutral party, I have to completely agree with you.

Sho had 411 bodyguards. Where is he now? Saying that someone has a shit-ton of bodyguards and you can't kill them is a weak excuse.

holy shit!!! 411 that is alot of money

205,500,000 to be exact.

Certainly not of old age, lol.

Sho had more bodyguards then anyone invovled in the war on the other side.

He ain't gonna die. Ever.

I'll second what Hickey said. The prophecy of the Aztecs says so.

Mrs-Doubtfire nods repeatedly

Sho had 411 bodyguards. Where is he now? Saying that someone has a shit-ton of bodyguards and you can't kill them is a weak excuse.

Reply by: Phreaking_Panda at Jun 03, '11 04:59

Well let me see, the whole site was attacking NY so after the first wave the only people left alive where the people who didn't have big enough guns sent at them meaning the rest of the site's hitters could pretty much shoot his BG's without reprisal, had it been the other way around and NY attacked CH with a few other cities help then it would have been the same thing in reverse shooting Roman's BG's.

The truth of the matter is that everyone in this game can die, period. Whether it's a full on war, a coup, wackback, 1% on a protection shot, etc. EVERYONE is capable of death. That is one of the only certain things in this game.

Sure, BGs, huge cities, CL boost, all of those things may seem like a mountain that is greater than some can climb, but that is what makes the trip much more worth it. They are merely obstacles, not roadblocks as people act like they are.

And it's the people that treat them as roadblocks that have never been successful. Those who look at them as merely another check-point on the road to victory are the ones who accomplish what they set out to do.

In the wise words of one Miley Cyrus, "There's always gunna be another mountain, I'm always gunna wanna make it move. Always gunna be an uphill battle, sometimes I'm gunna have to lose. A'int about how fast I get there, a'int about what's waiting on the other side. Oh, it's the climb."

I scaled a mountain one time, Miley wasn't there, I cried.

True story :/

in regard to off mentioning how many people were picking at sho's bgs before he could be killed doesnt that hint at the face we really need to limit bgs.

BeachBum, I could be mistaken but I am sure there IS a BG limit already. The limit depends on how big.. the biggest gun is. It keeps minor balance there if you ask me.

AS if you limited everyone to 250 BG's.. then once your gun skill is above the ability to 250 BG's able to kill then.. it would be a waste of you having 250 BG's because someone can just shoot through them. Hence why I am sure the limit depends on how strong the strongest gun is currently alive.

Largely henced why Sho had a lot.. he also had a big gun. Just not capable of shooting through the immence Godfather Boosts and BG's that Prem and Roman have.

Like I said, I could be really mistaken but.. I do remember some mention of a limit like this a while back.