| Oct 01 - 00:49:22 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 [ > - >>> ] |
| Lets Get Our Shit Together - Bugfixapalooza! | Started by: Squishy on Dec 17, '09 13:49 |
|
I may be the only one annoyed by this, but the RHM's mail defaulting to the CL's? I would rather see my mail first, then use that 'show mail for' option when I'm bored and want to see who he's cybering with in there. |
|
| Reply by: Alan_Wake at Dec 23, '09 06:19 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Not sure if it's a bug or not but it would be nice if a |
|
| Reply by: El_Nino at Dec 23, '09 06:50 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Look at Nino. Money grabbing all over the shop. |
|
| Reply by: bighead at Dec 27, '09 06:29 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I know this isn't really a "fix" issue but since we got the "mark unread" button I would love an "archive" button with that aswell. |
|
| Reply by: ScipitaRourke at Dec 28, '09 04:42 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I'm still the contact of a few dead people, that could be amended. |
|
| Reply by: Rhuarc at Dec 29, '09 06:40 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Scipita, thats a fab idea. I would also like to see a button like that. And Rhuarc I was just about to come and say the same thing. |
|
| Reply by: Mikhail-Faustin at Dec 30, '09 09:48 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Inactive family members - I think his/her status should say inactive and not alive. I seen profiles of other family members saying alive and not inactive when they have clearly gone over 7 days. I can understand the whole confusion but it doesn't take a lot to see if they that inactive is sponsored or not. |
|
| Reply by: Dr_Jekyll at Dec 31, '09 21:15 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Since the new year, sorting your crew members by activity no longer works correctly. |
|
| Reply by: RisingDown at Jan 01, '10 05:11 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
What Rising down said, when you sort your crew by activity, it doesnt recognise that the 1st of January is most recent :/ |
|
| Reply by: Youngsta at Jan 01, '10 15:13 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
"Sometimes pickpocketing someone is viewed as an attack - and may result in they or their associates retaliating against you." shouldn't this read: Sometimes pickpocketing someone is viewed as an attack - and may result in them or their associates retaliating against you. |
|
| Reply by: sanpei at Jan 04, '10 04:16 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Oh another bug, when someone posts in your backalley thread you get a personal saying "Blabedieblachicken replied in your ... NAMETHREADHOTLINKCLICK...." |
|
| Reply by: ScipitaRourke at Jan 04, '10 18:12 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
When you initially start an MUC, before you invite any of the people listed as eligible/available, the links to their names don't work. They're just pointing to: |
|
| Reply by: BoabyWanKenobi at Jan 07, '10 11:01 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
perhaps this is intentional, if so it doesn't make sense to me... You can bribe your DFP from any city and the FBN agent for that city says he'll keep his men away (and your timer resets). Would think you would have to be in DFP's city to do this. |
|
| Reply by: Big_Mike at Jan 07, '10 23:27 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Not a bug as such, but could the personal for 'you have taken on the contract' include a hyperlink to the target's name- as is the case for 'victim' personals? |
|
| Reply by: Noah-Levenstein at Jan 15, '10 08:25 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
More sponsorship issues (Sorry Anoobis). When a member is dropped their associate is still sponsored by that person not moved to directly under the CL. Also when a CL dies and a sponsor joins a new family the associate still say's it's sponsored by them but when it dies it says sponsor none (if it dies before accepting an invite). |
|
| Reply by: Flash-Fire at Jan 15, '10 17:55 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I would like the back alley thread count to be completely independent. |
|
| Reply by: Rhuarc at Jan 17, '10 07:33 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Fix the Obits page so you can search backwards past page 7. Thanks. |
|
| Reply by: Matterhorn at Jan 21, '10 18:45 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Hey Squishy - This has probably been pointed it out but the game logic (and order) for error messages when wacking seems strange. The game seems to check for protection time before checking if the attacker is in the same city as the target. This means that we can repeatedly query if our target is protected before wasting our flight. This is problematic from a strategic as well as an RP perspective. Also - I repeatedly see a "someone beat you to the hit" message when nobody really beat me to the hit. It usually goes like this: ..someone beat you to the hit.. ..target is too young to die.. ..someone beat you to the hit.. ..etc, etc This second bug seems fairly harmless, but some new hitters might give up when they see that message. |
|
| Reply by: Glock45 at Jan 27, '10 00:08 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
This is quite an obscure one.. |
|
| Reply by: -V- at Jan 28, '10 14:22 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Glock45 I was about to point out the 2nd bug you mentioned I second that motion :) |
|
| Reply by: ScrubbinBubbles at Jan 29, '10 10:50 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 [ > - >>> ] |
Minimum $20,000