May 12 - 04:08:47 |
|
Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1 2 [ > - >>> ] |
LA Business District. Revamped Rules | Started by: JkL on Feb 21, '10 13:37 |
Its another beautiful, sunny day in the City of Angels. JkL strolls out of his HQ, his security entourage forming a barricade. He is in a confident mood. The speed shutters on the FBI cameras go in to overdrive. JkL does not care though, he has more important matters to deal with. To the soapbox he goes. So, following some feedback, we've decided to simplify the rules for the LA business district. Apparently actually charging people was a little too intrusive into the individual's business practices. So, from now on the rules are very straightforward. To set up a business in LA, you will need to pay a one off fee of $50,000, then a weekly payment of $20,000 per week. Failing to pay will result in your business being torched, and closed. Alternatively, you can pay $1,000,000 up front and not worry about the weekly vig. If you wish to recoup that money by charging for entrance or services, well, we'd encourage it - if you'd rather just take the hit yourself, then that's your call. Existing business owners, you will be spared the start up fee, but you will be expected to make the weekly payment of $20,000 to me. And with that, JkL steps down from the trusty soapbox and is soon back in the safe confines of his HQ. |
|
Report Post | Tip |
Zuldazar claps |
|
Reply by: Zuldazar at Feb 21, '10 13:40 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Something I didn't understand from the last one is... People coming and asking me if I agree with JkL and The_Liar's business district ideas and implemenation. JkL is my Street Boss, meaning everything that he does for the benefit of the city as a whole comes through me first and I have the utmost respect and trust for anything he wants to implement. |
|
Reply by: PoisonousJelly at Feb 21, '10 13:45 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I think it's a great idea, will certainly weed out anyone who just wants to slap a seedy bar up to say they did, we'll end up with the quality level of businesses we want as good businessmen understand it takes money to build and run such. I'm looking forward to seeing this in action. |
|
Reply by: Alessia at Feb 21, '10 15:36 | |
Report Post | Tip |
CantThinkOfAName walks over to the man standing on the soapbox. Sir... 50k for setting up a business? Then 20k a week to keep that business running. Bit steep if you ask me. For the little business that goes through LA don't you think this is pushing it a bit much? On the other hand $1,000,000 dollers for a one time fee? Correct me is am wrong. 1000000 devided by 20000 = 50 weeks worth of payments (Wow yes i can use a calculator)... How do you know that the City of LA will be run by the same people? Also, 1million on time fee count for all your accounts dead or alive? There is alot of unansweard questions here that am sure people would love to know about. |
|
Reply by: CantThinkOfAName at Feb 21, '10 16:10 | |
Report Post | Tip |
20k is nothing these days, it's half the profits from the drugs run that you presumably did on the way in. We wanted a figure that was meaningful, while not being too pricey. It's meant to be extortion, after all. As for the one time fee, yes, that's basically a year's worth of payments, it is expensive for two reasons: 1 - It removes the hassle of having to make weekly payments, and charges a bit of a premium for that. 2 - People live longer these days, that's just the way it is. Obviously, should PJ and JkL die, these rules will become null and void, one cannot enforce the rules governing a city if they are not actually alive to do so. And in answer to your final question, the pass lasts your lifetime, it's not something that can be passed from father to son. While I am here, let me just say publicly that I take full responsibility for the rules being simplified, it was my over-exuberance that needlessly complicated the original plan and tried to dictate how businesses would be managed. Our goal is simply to extort money from businesses - y'know, like we're in the Mafia or something - I lost focus from that goal while thinking out the plans. |
|
Reply by: The_Liar at Feb 21, '10 16:23 | |
Report Post | Tip |
For the sake of argument, this is not a personal view nor a threat, simply me playing devil's advocate here... |
|
Reply by: Deimne at Feb 21, '10 16:31 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Well normally when a farther/mother dies the next of kin should take over the business, why can't the next of kin be left to pick up the bills and pay the rent to there newly found empire?... |
|
Reply by: CantThinkOfAName at Feb 21, '10 16:32 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Lucretia scratches her head. For the last few days she had pondered this issue and hadn't quite been sure how to respond. Finally, she decided to speak up a bit, even if she still was unsure where she stood on the issue in the end. |
|
Reply by: Lucretia_Borgia at Feb 21, '10 17:58 | |
Report Post | Tip |
This is your city, you run it how you please. But do you honestly think charging or closing down businesses of fellow mobsters which in turn will effect their revenue stream will end well? Another thing that comes into mind, sure people can pay, but if they don't want to, why should they? Will you really stop them? I guess this all comes down to power. Do you have the power to extort other mafia businesses without any repercussions? Also what is stopping other cities from extorting your city? |
|
Reply by: Pooh_Bear at Feb 22, '10 01:01 | |
Report Post | Tip |
We were not stopping anyone from coming to LA. We were not stopping anyone dealing drugs, committing felonies, ripping off post offices, or even entering places of business (as I said before, that last one was taking it way too far). All we were trying to do with this initiative is develop some realism in how our business district works, the concept that businesses would be allowed to operate in another city without paying some tribute to the head of that city is bizarre to me. Sadly it appears that the terms we bandy around these streets do not actually mean anything. Respect is only for those with the most powerful guns, perhaps it has always been this way and I merely romanticise the way our world should be. Either way, it has been made abundantly clear to us that no, we do not have the power to back this up, if violence has become the only solution. It is obvious to even the most casual observer that if push comes to shove, we residents of LA would all be dead in a matter of minutes. As such, we withdraw the rules for the LA business district. I'll be in the bar if you need me. |
|
Reply by: The_Liar at Feb 22, '10 04:27 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Interesting, people question your rules and instead of answering them and backing yourselves up, you stand down and remove the rules. |
|
Reply by: Pooh_Bear at Feb 22, '10 05:11 | |
Report Post | Tip |
When two godfathers come out in opposition to a proposal, and one of their leaders challenged it physically within hours of the initial announcement it becomes pretty clear that standing by this plan is not worth the lives of everyone in LA. While I am a firm believer that balls and guts can take you so far, family history teaches me that they can also take you to an early grave - especially when it is flying in the face of those cities considerably more powerful than ours. That's just the reality of our lives these days, sadly. As for the taxes, I believe those taxes kick in at Godfather, PJ isn't Let's be honest, the business district is not a reason to visit any city. A surplus of sleeping bums or favourable drug prices are the only reasons the vast majority of the population travels. I have the utmost respect for PJ, and JkL, stating a fact isn't disrespectful, it's merely an honest appraisal of where we stand at the moment. At a time when everything seems to boil down to our ability to defend it physically, it would be nigh on suicidal to continue to push for something which we cannot uphold without the use of violence, which we don't want. I had hoped at the outset that torching and closing the businesses (something we cleared with city hall in advance to ensure we weren't crossing any lines from that perspective) would be enough. It appears however that businesses we do torch and close can magically re-open themselves, even if this weren't the case, there is nothing to stop those intent on flouting the would-be rules from opening another, and another, and another... This means that the only other method of enforcing these rules is to start shooting... and even ignoring the fact we'd lose, that was never what this was about. It wasn't a power play, merely an attempt to bring a level or realism to the business district I felt was lacking. In all honesty, you are right, I had not thought this through to this conclusion, probably as a result of those rose-tinted lenses through which I tend to view things, the eternal optimist in me believing that not everything in this world boils down to power |
|
Reply by: The_Liar at Feb 22, '10 06:42 | |
Report Post | Tip |
First of all I may have made a mistake, I forgot that LA does not have a Godfather at the moment so those taxes don't come into effect. All the same why not start getting businesses running now, good ones, so when the moment finally arrives when you get a Godfather your taxes will bring in great revenue. |
|
Reply by: Pooh_Bear at Feb 22, '10 07:25 | |
Report Post | Tip |
As our ancestors from Italy have learned us... it's a fact that business owners pay a protection money in order for their business to survive. |
|
Reply by: ScipitaRourke at Feb 22, '10 07:45 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Regarding this point only, I would strongly disagree with city hall having anything to do with "business maintenance" or the enforcing of mobster-initiated rules. Any such policies should be mobster enforced. |
|
Reply by: Hoopi at Feb 22, '10 07:48 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Tyrion steps forward to venture a comment. |
|
Reply by: Tyrion at Feb 22, '10 08:15 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I am not sure whether i agree with what LA are doing with their business district but what i will say is this. If they wish to start a business tax, that is completely up to them. But with so many people opposed to the idea i think we could see a severe lack of activity in the LA business district. Why would someone pay to open a business in LA when they can go to another city and open it there for free? Sure, like most of the other cities LA want a city tax of some sort to make money, can't blame them, afterall who doesn't like making money? I just don't think the business they have chosen will attract much interest but i could be wrong. Be interesting to see how it works out. |
|
Reply by: Erratic at Feb 22, '10 08:16 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Obviously i have not had my morning coffee and missed the point where this business idea had been scrapped. Shame to see a new idea go to waste but i believe it could be for the best. |
|
Reply by: Erratic at Feb 22, '10 08:20 | |
Report Post | Tip |
As do I Erratic. |
|
Reply by: PoisonousJelly at Feb 22, '10 08:41 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1 2 [ > - >>> ] |
Minimum $20,000