| Sep 21 - 22:52:08 |
|
| Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 4  |
| Squire's death | Started by: Hickey on Aug 02, '10 16:19 |
|
I know that this topic has been beaten to death, and I should probably just let it die, but I haven't had the chance to put my two cents in yet, so here goes:
You can not justify leaving a crew. We say that, once you are made, the only way out is death, but it is really well-known that this starts with your acceptance of the crew invite. Once you have seen the inside of a crew's HQ, you are not to make it in to another one alive. That's just how it works. Everyone knows it.
Additionally, I'm shocked to see so many publicly questioning the actions of crew leaders and godfathers. And in a disrespectful manner, too. It's one thing to think something--no one agrees with everything that goes on around here--but it's quite another to say it.
Between jumping ship and publicly bashing leaders, I don't know what's gotten into us youngsters these days. |
|
| Reply by: Cunning at Aug 03, '10 11:26 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Cunning, yesterday I thought about what you said and thought it better to not post about this topic. You are right, it indeed has been beaten to death. Anyway, about seeing the inside of the HQ and then leaving a family. I WAS going to say something about that but then I thought, if this man thought it was an importance to make sure that his son knew the information of Hickey's HQ, would he not include it in the journal to be passed down? It's not likely he would forget so really there is nothing you can really do about that aspect. Unless of course you change everything in the HQ around. Plus, it's not like a mere gangster would be inside the loop of the big guns of the Hit Squad is it. I'm not trying to justify the man's actions for leaving, I am simply asking a question to have clarity on the subject. |
|
| Reply by: SilentKnight at Aug 03, '10 12:02 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I thought someone might call me on that aspect. Let me first say that I stand by my original statement that, "Oh, he couldn't have done any harm anyway," does not, in any way, justify jumping ship.
That being said, there are pieces of critical information (such as crew structure, including HSL, etc) that a mere gangster may have access to.
It's true that this information can always be passed down through generations, but that certainly is not a valid reason why the offending gangster should be kept alive: "Oh, he already knows all that he could know, anyway, so we might as well let him go." For the record, my first claim, "once you have seen the inside of a crew's HQ..." was more figurative than literal. It is more about respect than physical danger, and it is much more a matter of principal than anything else. |
|
| Reply by: Cunning at Aug 03, '10 12:27 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Leaving one organization to join one in a another city altogether is completely indefensible. |
|
| Reply by: Gwarble at Aug 03, '10 18:07 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
wow tahts crazy |
|
| Reply by: HYung at Aug 03, '10 18:07 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I can definitely say that I see this in a totally different light now. Unlike the use by alot of mobsters, coming to voice yourself in the streets can teach us young bucks a thing or two of how things are done in the eyes of a true leader. Thank you, GodFather Gwarble. |
|
| Reply by: SilentKnight at Aug 03, '10 19:04 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
I've killed for less. End of story. |
|
| Reply by: Teddy at Aug 03, '10 20:31 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Thanks for that piece of informative spiel, Teddy.
I'm in disagreement with certain factors of this scenario, while I'm not defending the actions of the deceased I think there is an underlying issue which has become blurred due to how the events were purported or at least which are the focus and ire of the masses.
Throughout time, in this thing of ours associates have and I hope will continue to defect and not always in acrimonious circumstances, of course there are protocols that must be followed as this case overwhelmingly proves but it isn't impossible and shouldn't be viewed as taboo just because the current generation deem it unacceptable. We are in many ways defined by our history and this subject is important to our future, rewriting the books with a loose interpretation of our ways poses just as much of dangerous threat as any other feature of our lives.
Our perceptions will always differ and I understand the current regime is the standard bearer and I wont defy my people, I have my beliefs and understandings but also my rules, they're separate entities which stops potential destruction of precedents.
I hope some of this makes sense, I'm trying to convey my general concerns, these are grey areas I suppose, of which we have plenty but I think it's important to keep them as such instead of fundamental rules which we can't interpret for the communities benefit. |
|
| Reply by: Wayfarer at Aug 03, '10 21:52 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
OOC: Is that ridiculously tiny because I copied and pasted?
Please don't mock as I feel a size complex approaching.
(Please don't happen again.) |
|
| Reply by: Wayfarer at Aug 03, '10 21:54 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Hildebrand strains to hear Wayfarer
Speak up lad. No one has yet dressed you down, so no need to be timid. |
|
| Reply by: Hildebrand at Aug 03, '10 21:57 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Wayfarer for Spokesperson of The Month. |
|
| Reply by: SilentKnight at Aug 03, '10 22:02 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Yes, Wayfarer, a truly riveting and well-put contention. It's not easy to represent a generally opposing view with such tact, and you've certainly done so in this case.
SilentKnight, if your words before were earnest, "I can definitely say that I see this in a totally different light now..." and so forth, then I am pleased, and happy to have met you. You are a shining example of a discussion I had with some friends the just the other day. |
|
| Reply by: Cunning at Aug 03, '10 22:15 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Thank you, Cunning. I appreciate that alot. |
|
| Reply by: SilentKnight at Aug 03, '10 22:24 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
The current generation and any generation thereafter should deem this unacceptable. |
|
| Reply by: Gwarble at Aug 04, '10 04:27 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Hickey is dead!!!!
<em>Runs off to buy a paper and check the Obits</em> |
|
| Reply by: Whodidunikabollokoff at Aug 04, '10 04:28 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Squire's death. |
|
| Reply by: Gwarble at Aug 04, '10 04:33 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Judge Death see's a chance to lighten the mood somewhat, an unusual thing for a death dealing corpse to do, but in the interests of harmony and spreading more intercity co-operation it is something he feels that he must do. |
|
| Reply by: JudgeDeath at Aug 04, '10 05:19 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Woooo, That slip of the tongue was nearly as big as Ray_Carling. Heyoo. |
|
| Reply by: Barnie at Aug 04, '10 14:47 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
Well in my opinion, it is a gangster, and when they accept your invite, they have no idea of what your rules are, what if they don't agree with some of them, and wish to leave. Though if he did not request permission first then I see your problem, but I feel that a cash amount could have been made up in punishment. |
|
| Reply by: Hector at Aug 05, '10 11:12 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
|
RIP Hickey. |
|
| Reply by: Altidore at Aug 05, '10 12:11 | |
| Report Post | Tip |
| Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: [ <<< - < ] 1 2 3 4  |
Minimum $20,000