May 02 - 08:36:53 |
|
Post Reply | Post new topic | Page: 1 2 3 4 [ > - >>> ] |
The Night I Hunted MikeHunt | Started by: StanPython on Aug 20, '12 21:55 |
It was a hot evening in New Orleans, the Becontree was bustling with activity. The recent Durden attack had left masses of unemployed bodyguards and most of the Manovanni family were taking advantage and practicing their aim. My trusted RH was away in Chicago chasing such bodyguards, turning the corner at speed on the tail of a Durden she came across a bodyguard smoking alone. Drawing her pistol she shot him in the chest, dropping him instantly.
|
|
Report Post | Tip |
I reckon I's be the one to say something here. All do respects to you their Boss. Twas a time when Ol Fiddler could have accepted such a statement with open arms. Seeming how's this thang of ours has changed so much lately, there's really no reasons to wait on dem their pickpockets. I means given the fact that you can pickpockets and it dont effects ya shooting. No needs to waits around to see's if you's can do a kill. Just do both.
Partain me doe sir, I's just a Ol guy playing a fiddle. Don't minds me. |
|
Reply by: Fiddler at Aug 20, '12 22:18 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Fortunately any debate was well and truly covered in a previous speech I heard the other day. All I can say is that the action that Mr Hunt took was rash and jeopardised his whole family with the action. I'm happy that retribution took place, and that there was little hesitation in Stan's actions. |
|
Reply by: Stryver at Aug 20, '12 23:25 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Elsa's deed was punishable by death, but by Mr. Teruzzo's hand, or at least with his permission. Even if Elsa had shot a made guy, there should have been a sit down. However, she shot a bodyguard, someone who wasn't in Mike's official books and prepared compensation, so when you compare the attack by Elsa with the one by Mike, you see that Elsa's offense was almost nonexistent. |
|
Reply by: Maestro at Aug 20, '12 23:43 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Maestro and Stryver sum it up. Elsa was due to be punished after compensation was paid. Mike acted rashly and he paid the price for his mistake. Although, what Elsa did was wrong, it was a mistake and was going to be dealth with internally.
Basically, two wrongs don't make a right. |
|
Reply by: TheRealDeal at Aug 21, '12 00:26 | |
Report Post | Tip |
He shot your RHM without a talk is a point. You took your action, sure. You suceeded. But using private conversations, using his last words to try and drag Mike's name through the mud, and his obligations outside these shores to create an image of him that benefits your own, that is petty, childish, and very unbecoming of a mafioso.
You also should consider, when sharing private conversations and all I just mentioned, the shady actions involved with your new associate who scammed and betrayed her comrades. And you going against your word with an old friend. Not that they didn't prove to be good moves for you, but if that is how you want to handle your totally unnecessary public relations campaign, you should consider your own actions. Beyond what I've already said there will be no showing notes and long winded smear campaigns. Because that would be bordering pathetic. |
|
Reply by: Mikey at Aug 21, '12 02:51 | |
Report Post | Tip |
I don't understand something, Mikey. You say that MikeHunt and Stan were friends? And friends shoot at each other's RHs whenever they see fit? They don't give their friends the opportunity to do the right thing? |
|
Reply by: Aidan at Aug 21, '12 02:57 | |
Report Post | Tip |
It seems to me that everyone is twisting shit around. Think about it, a RH to a city shouldn't be making those kinds of mistakes in the first place. Would that not have been proper cause for war anyways? If you ask me, Chicago should have gone to war then and there. But Mike made the mistake of trusting Stan and look where that got him. Stabbed in the back. Mike and Stan did talk after it and they both agreed that all was good. So it looks to me that Stan's the one with the problem. Mike also trust Alison, look what happened to him. Now you guys want to follow a person that trusts her as well? Is that really what you guys want to do? I wouldn't. |
|
Reply by: LongTongue at Aug 21, '12 03:04 | |
Report Post | Tip |
You must be speaking to another Mikey, as none of what you said resembles any tangible response to what I said, in any concept of reality. I'm not speaking negatively about how Stan handled anything prior to this slander filled public relations hogwash.
This isn't high school debate team where rhetorical questions and appeals to emotion might score points. If you want to have an argument like a grown man, you need to argue against the points the other guy made. |
|
Reply by: Mikey at Aug 21, '12 03:08 | |
Report Post | Tip |
And of course I was talking to Aidan there. |
|
Reply by: Mikey at Aug 21, '12 03:09 | |
Report Post | Tip |
The fact that the shot BG is still being called 'an accident', and what happened being called a 'hunt', is just mind blowing.
Stan did what he thought he had to do. All the respect in the world for that. But the false bravado is rather sickening. In no way, shape, or form was this a hunt. You shot sleeping BG's. Then when the BG's were low enough, you shot a sleeping CL.
Kudos for the war efforts, shame on you for the propaganda. |
|
Reply by: Osmosis at Aug 21, '12 03:12 | |
Report Post | Tip |
It really is getting entertaining watching people trying to justify a complete fuckup by MikeHunt. He was clearly at fault and I'm sure you were loyal to him but its time to grow up and realize that he made the wrong decision and got his city killed. I'm sure you fought valiantly but at this point just give it up, you're not proving anything to anyone. |
|
Reply by: Whiskey at Aug 21, '12 03:12 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Someone want to tell me how much time went by before Elsa decided to speak up about her "mistake"? Ten minutes if I'm correct. It seems that she thought she had gotten away with it. It wasn't until after confronted with it that she turned herself in. |
|
Reply by: LongTongue at Aug 21, '12 03:23 | |
Report Post | Tip |
So if no one was aware of it how were they supposed to punish her. I'm sure as soon as it was found out they were in the process of punishing her, instead, Mike decided to break unwritten rules and take matters into his own hands and signed his own death warrant. |
|
Reply by: Whiskey at Aug 21, '12 03:26 | |
Report Post | Tip |
If you kill someone for fucking your wife, kill them for fucking your wife. That's your plan, if you succeed, nice work. However, don't drag their corpse through the street and tell everyone they soiled themselves when they died, especially if that's a lie, and the truth is more, you soiled yourself when you killed them. |
|
Reply by: Mikey at Aug 21, '12 03:26 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Whiskey, as a RH it was her duty to explain it. Yet she contacted nobody about it. That right there sends off red flags for me that she's obviously not accidentally shooting. |
|
Reply by: LongTongue at Aug 21, '12 03:29 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Yet when it was reported it was being taken care of, Mikehunt made the wrong decision and got greedy. I'm not going to waste any more time on this because you're making the same dumb points over and over. I'm sure you're a great gangster, now is the time to prove it instead of running your mouth. Just like the old saying: If you don't like something, rank up and do something about it. |
|
Reply by: Whiskey at Aug 21, '12 03:32 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Appeals to emotion, rhetorical questions, avoiding the issue, making arbitrary points, the rank up and do something cliche, and SCENE! |
|
Reply by: Mikey at Aug 21, '12 03:34 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Whiskey, you're making the same dumb points over and over. "MikeHunt made the mistake of shooting her without consulting Stan first." That's been said dozens of times. If you're allowed to make the same dumb points over and over, then guess what, so am I. |
|
Reply by: LongTongue at Aug 21, '12 03:34 | |
Report Post | Tip |
My only opinon on this matter would be i feel for the family members of both families. Getting dragged into something that could of been solved at the higher level. I dont believe a whole family should attack over one person. Maybe if one cl attacked another cl but over one person's misjudegemnt or sucidness. Why have 40 or 50 or 60 people die over something so little. The people at fault can be dealt with. Taking out entire familes over what i believe to be a small mater compared to other is wrong to those members. I would be pissed if i had to go to war over something that can be handled at a higher level. |
|
Reply by: Dean_Winchester at Aug 21, '12 03:42 | |
Report Post | Tip |
Post Reply | View All Threads | Page: 1 2 3 4 [ > - >>> ] |
Minimum $20,000