BillyNoMates one of 2 cities that can't get a GF because the leaders can't get the units. (in fact the only city with 2 leaders that dont have the units, but do have the age)  But go on, tell yourself whatever makes you feel better :)

What does my rank or units have to do with anything, Esquie?

Esquie, you're no Norman Mailer, except you're quite similar in many ways.

BillyNoMates I have 10k+ hours with multiple CL, GF, and GFC runs.  So you're incorrect.  But please think what you will.

SimonTheSwanHunter if your members wouldn't tag me after I had moved on I wouldnt have said shit, but yes the point of this game and becoming a leader is to be a GF.  No one in DT seems to be capable of doing so.

BillyNoMates I have 10k+ hours with multiple CL, GF, and GFC runs. So you're incorrect. But please think what you will.

 Yeah ok. Name one. Or are we to just take your word for it without you providing an ounce of proof to back up your claims of MR heroism

This is OOC, so the fact they are sponsored by me is completely irrelevant. You're making this about me and Detroit for reasons known only to yourself. But if you want to make it in-character, as you've got such a problem with me, my units and my city, please don't come to Detroit again. 

If you had any reading comprehension you'd have noticed that all 4 of my previous links were from a GFC of NY account, but go off king.

If you guys spent half as much time working on your gameplay/city as you did defending 10 hours a week, we'd have orgy city by now.

Imagine speaking about reading comprehension when you misunderstood my point entirely. 

That response was to Billy, not you SimonTheSwanHunter.  I don't know why you guys keep wanting to drag me in when I'm moved on.  Clearly you're all insecure about your own abilities. I may suggest a therapist or Hims or something

I know it was, you referenced defending 10 hours a week though, which triggered your initial nonsense, which wasn't my point at all. It was that there are many more important indicators of quality of leadership than hours logged in. To state otherwise is either a disingenuous deflection to pretend that is what I said to fit your narrative, or, my own view based on your continued stupidity in this thread, you didn't understand my point and wanted to make it into something it wasn't.

As for being dragged in, someone tagged you in the OOC forum. Player to player. You made it about me, again and Detroit, again. Who is dragging whom into things? 

I would like to announce that twigs is officially banned from Los Angeles.

I was just made aware that I don't have the power to ban anyone from Los Angeles. Sorry, I formally withdraw my ban. 

Welcome back to Los Angeles, twigs. I never wanted it any other way.

esquie is right about your gameplay Simon

Maybe he can give you some clicking practice so you can also invest 10k+ hours into GF runs no one remembers

Actually it appears I owe Esquie an apology, as I am now noticing he did post links as proof. I will move on from this now as well much like your good self. Have a good day

Actually I take it back. Just noticing Esquie posted the same link twice to artificially inflate his “achievements”, if you want to call them that. This fucking guy lol. Nice try though. Apology rescinded

Since you guys don't want to just let me move on I'll answer you all individually

simontheswanhunter

 I know it was, you referenced defending 10 hours a week though, which triggered your initial nonsense, which wasn't my point at all

From your original post: 

10 hours a week gaming might be of little consequence to some, but can be a significant proportion of another's leisure time.

Again, I'm over it. If you want to have a CL who never logs on that's on you.  But you can't build yourself, your gun, or your city on that amount of time.

BillyNoMates, I'll just quote you the same reply I gave someone else (removing the tag)

Not sure if you're blind or just dumb Drieza, but I did post that I had accidentally copied the same link twice and put the actual in the literal next post.

GhostOfHeadCoach, nah I'm good but ty.

Move on from what? You haven't tried to move on at all, despite claiming to be dragged in, it was you who made this about me and Detroit, in the the Out of Character forum. Now you keep responding trying to misrepresent what I said. This paste is another example of that, which even taken out of the context of my full response (that there are more accurate means of assessing leadership quality than hours logged in), doesn't support what you've said. I didn't say you could "build a gun" on 10 hours a week, did I? What I said was that to some, 10 hours a week gaming, is actually quite a lot of their leisure time. Do you disagree with that statement? If you do, explain how. If not, stop trying to put words in my mouth to fit your narrative. My response was about the flaws of this thread, the author's intention, and using only hours logged in to judge anything except the obvious; hours logged in.